1654

I just realized /c/piracy is the most subscribed community in the lemmyverse! (lemmy.dbzer0.com)

submitted 8 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

144 comments fedilink hide all child comments

https://lemmyverse.net/communities?order=subscribers

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] [email protected] 12 points 8 months ago

It's an issue that could be solved within lemmy where communities with the same name should be able to merge and show each others content.

It also happens when users join and pick the largest community at the time, which may be overtaken later but the user will never know unless they often go looking

[-] [email protected] 19 points 8 months ago

It's an issue that could be solved within lemmy where communities with the same name should be able to merge and show each others content.

This is bad idea though, unless if it's an optional feature that the users themselves choose to activate (e.g similar to multireddit, but you don't have to manually curate the communities yourself). Imagine the same community from two opposing instances (e.g. blahaj and hexbear) somehow got merged by default. That would be an absolute shitshow. Also, how would moderation work? Those communities often have different moderation rule. Can mods from one community remove posts from another community with the same name? This would also be an absolute shitshow.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago

To ensure maximum shitshow, when channels merge the mods only are allowed to mod users from the merged instances not their own.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago

Nah. Make the mods battle in a gladiatorial arena for my enjoyment. Winner get the userbase.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

Aliasing would work here. Allow a user to create an alias "meme" community that contains multiple meme based comunities. So when a user submits content to the alias the home server can just publish it on all communities. This is only user visible, so the community itself doesn't change... but from a user perspective you see more content under the same alias. Posts made this way could also have some additional Metadata to condense them together when you see the same post on multiple communities.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

I like this idea as it could all be done in-browser client side.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

This should be an optional feature for moderators. Mods from both communities must virtually shake hands and merge their communities into one. They could tweak how cross-moderation works. If one side becomes unmanageable, the other side can cut the line and split the community again.

Genuinely sounds like a solid idea to me. There are some lingering questions - both technical and non-technical - but they're fairly small. Such as:

How easy or hard is it to implement?
When communities merge, do their histories merge too or do only new posts show up to both? (My opinion: only new posts)
When a merged community splits, do both sides keep a full copy of the posts from the time they were merged, or do they delete the posts that were posted to the other community? (My opinion: keep the history)
Do they have to match everything - community description, exact wording of rules, graphics, exact name, etc - or do they just need to show each other's posts? (My opinion: just show each other's posts. It should basically be an automatic cross-post.)
Should Lemmy software make this apparent to users, or should the responsibility lie on the mods to make the announcement? This question could be asked separately for merge events, split events, and the merged steady state - i.e. should Lemmy show some info about it while the communities are merged. (My opinion: I think especially for splits, it's important to let the users know especially if the mods want to hide it. The other cases I think it could be left up to the mods, although it would do no harm if Lemmy let you know which communities are merged)

My opinion to those questions is what I think is the "right" way to do it, but I also suspect my opinions to 2-4 are the easiest to implement.