this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2024
15 points (94.1% liked)

Science Communication

885 readers
1 users here now

Welcome to c/SciComm @ Mander.xyz!

Science Communication



Notice Board

This is a work in progress, please don't mind the mess.



About

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Be kind and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.


Resources

Outreach:

Networking:



Similar Communities


Sister Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Plants & Gardening

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Memes

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Although the bar chart is objectively better, especially the 3d ones, the pie chart is more intuitive and simpler to understand for a lot of people.

A halfway point in between is the tree map chart example

The color blindness problem can mostly be avoided. The tiny slices issues can be present in all three including the bar chart, for example if we have this data (these are percentages): 50 30 18 0.5 0.3 0.2 etc... The final bar chart would be either too long or too squished.

In a tree map chart, by moving the data/squares around you can avoid the problem of the squares being squished which the author is complaining about

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Is this a troll?