this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2024
361 points (97.9% liked)

politics

19145 readers
2487 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

“We will see if this is a legal and valid election,” Stefanik, a member of House GOP leadership and a Donald Trump ally, said in an interview with “Meet the Press.”

Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y., on Sunday wouldn’t commit to certifying the 2024 election results during an interview on NBC News’ “Meet the Press.”

While interviewing Stefanik, who serves in House Republican leadership, host Kristen Welker asked, “Would you vote to certify, and will you vote to certify, the results of the 2024 election no matter what they show?”

Stefanik, who has boosted former President Donald Trump’s baseless claims of widespread fraud in the 2020 election, said that she did not vote to certify the 2020 results in the state of Pennsylvania and several other states because there were “unconstitutional acts circumventing the state legislature and unilaterally changing election law.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Dur, are you that dumb or what ? Even If you don't like the results, you have to accept them. That is the whole issue about it.

It is not a matter of a toddler wanting another toy, it is a politician. I know that you and that idiot also have the mental capacity of a toddler but without restrictions. Even if you don't like the result you have to accept it.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I really need to stop trying to explain the obvious to idiots.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Why, did your mirror broke?

Still that you do not understand something so easy is really showing how much of an idiot you are.

Even if that person doesn't like the result, or thr maga moronic cult, they have to accept the result, like it or not.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Buuuu the stupid maga only had that to refute hahahhahahaha nice going idiot.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Actually, I'm an anarchosyndicalist, and it wasn't an attempt to refute anything.

It was just a brief statement mocking someone I knew wouldn't understand it, because they're a circle jerking liberal with a brain the size of a peanut and the situational comprehension to match.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Nah, more like a conservative idiot.

Sure you couldn't refute a thing, you lack the capacity to give an actual good argument.

Lol, said by an idiot who has the reading comprehension of a toddler hahahahaj the irony.

But again, only an idiot would think that one person can just skip their functions of their job, just because they didn't like the results. That is how stupid you are.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

😆

Stop bro, you've already proved me right, you don't have to keep talking!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago

In what? That you are a conservative snowflake? And idiot? And that you cannot even comprehend what you read? Or that you have the restraint of a toddler?