this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2024
146 points (99.3% liked)

Selfhosted

40183 readers
518 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
146
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Built a nice little PiKVM and deployed it in my NAS. The NAS is heavy and placed in a dark half-height place under the stairs so it’s awkward when things go wrong and you need hardware access.

The built KVM

For those that don’t know what PiKVM is: https://pikvm.org/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago (2 children)

So it's a computer that lets you remotely control another computer? Is the advantage over SSH or remote desktop etc that you can interact with stuff outside the OS, like in BIOS?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That's basically it. It guarantees you can always access your computer remotely, even if you broke your ssh, or accidentally messed up your network config, or can't boot due to filesystem corruption and need to run fsck from recovery mode.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago

Exactly, it isn’t a replacement. It is redundancy in the form of a screen with keyboard and mouse directly connected, but accessibly from remote (my couch). It is far from my primary interface with the server.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yes. This is home-made out-of-band management, like HP's iLO, Dell's iDRAC, or generic IPMI. Not only is it a virtual KVM (keyboard/video/mouse), you can pass the host's power button through this device so you can remotely power on or reset a hung or powered-off system, or mount and boot from a virtual floppy or ISO to completely reinstall the remote system.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Cool, So actually something one could build out of anything with an USB, Ethernet port. But not sure how to add the Display receiver.. They using a RPi for this as well. I don't like that it occupies Video connector. Lots of systems only have a single one

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It’s kind of the point here to occupy the video out as this is a server and has no screen connected otherwise. Normally it doesn’t need one.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I have to admit, that this might be true the very most cases. But there are more reasons why servers still have a video-port.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Why else would a server have a video port?