this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2024
198 points (97.1% liked)

PC Gaming

8576 readers
357 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -4 points 10 months ago (3 children)

... almost everyone already has a computer, often for school/work. A console is a separate instrument though.

This is kinda like saying there's more tablespoons than ladles in American kitchens.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's not the PC industry, it's the PC gaming industry.

ie: almost exclusively games sold for PC platform/Windows.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Right. Just saying that when the size of the PC industry is so much bigger, is it any surprise whatsoever that PC gaming also dominates? I would have expected no other result.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's not surprising at all but that's not why. More people use laptops or office PCs for daily driving and work. Those are not going to work for a ton of games like a console will.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

To the contrary, the vast majority of all games that exist do not require a robust system. Especially given the rise of microtransactions.

Don't lose sight of what games in the world are actually the most popular. It's not high-end stuff. It's Candy Crush and shit.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Don't lose sight of what games in the world are actually the most popular. It's not high-end stuff. It's Candy Crush and shit.

You're right, those games are popular and very profitable and you don't need a PC to play them. You're just going to play them on mobile. You know what you're not going to play on mobile? PC games.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Liiiike, League of Legends? Point stands.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

You're just cherry-picking an example. No, I mean like the thousands of games that are released every year that won't run or aren't available on the most powerful of mobile devices. Not to mention the ones that just suck on a small display.

What are you even doing? Are you really trying to make the point that there's zero delineation between mobile and PC games?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No, I'm expressing my point that the main reason PC gaming is so much bigger than console gaming is because the number of available machines is many times higher. Someone replied that most PCs are not specced to play games. I countered by saying most games don't require strong specs, because the most popular games are almost always garbage.

League of Legends is my current example since apparently Candy Crush didn't adequately communicate my point. There are plenty of other examples I could come up with if my point is still not understood.

Why is this so bothersome?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's bothersome that you refuse to acknowledge that the vast majority of popular/profitable PC games are not playable on cheap, office-grade, low-end hardware. And that you insist on cherry-picking a handful of examples that do as representative of the majority.

There are certainly a wide variety of popular/profitable mobile games that you can't/don't play on PC either for compatibility or because they're unavailable, or because they're tailored to touchscreen devices.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

The vast majority? That's just not true. Probably 10%. The issue here is you seem to think the good games are the popular/most profitable ones. I'm pretty sure that's incorrect. VNs, MMOs, gambling games, etc. All that shit exists, is profitable, and is popular. Yet your focus seems to be on high end stuff for some reason. I am not the one cherry picking.

I played many on shitty office hardware back in the day.

Mobile games being different I'll grant.

edit: I think I get it, this is just a "PC master race" thing, isn't it? People are upset I'm not doing the circlejerk thing and pumping their egos for them. I'm too old for that bullshit.

Do you remember farmville?

Also, most of those high end games? Also available on console. It's the weird, not-high-end stuff that is usually unique to PC, with a few exceptions.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

The issue here is you seem to think the good games are the popular/most profitable ones.

I didn't interject my personal opinions anywhere. You're the one doing that.

I am not the one cherry picking.

You are though. I haven't picked anything at all. The list is too long.

Also, most of those high end games? Also available on console.

PC vs. console is an entirely different discussion. The point is that they're not on mobile.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This post is about PC gaming having a larger market share than all consoles combined. And my list is 10x the size of yours, easily. High end games are not even close to most of them, and also are subject to financial failure.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

And this comment thread started with your statement that "Everything is going to converge on mobile device gaming."

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Ah. That was someone else.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago

as @Spuddlesv2 noted, this is about the market in terms of money made in the US and specifically in the sphere of gaming; not the single units delivered.

Still, we can extend skepticism on this data considering that most of the money is, probably, made in microtransactions: all consoles driven by their own monopolistic entity (Sony, Microsoft and Nintendo) are in disadvantaged because they demands cuts while on PC, as Epic Store with Fortnite and Steam with CS:GO, those who publish on PC are free to take the 100% of their cuts without have to split with the platform holder (Sony, Microsoft and Nintendo). The appeal for GaaS, unfortunately, is vastly huge on both Mobile and PC (as open platforms) than consoles (which are closed).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

What is a tablespoon in the US then? In the UK a tablespoon is probably not that much more common than a ladle, it's much bigger than anything you'd use to eat with and generally is used as a serving spoon or a measurement when cooking/baking.

Our "common" spoon which is mouth sized is called a dessert spoon.