this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2023
40 points (97.6% liked)
Asklemmy
43856 readers
1859 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- [email protected]: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It said era, so I assume "modern" could just as well land you in 2006 Iraq, if it's even allowed.
I mean, it's also time travel, not location travel, so I'd be most likely to end up in space and die almost instantly.
Depends what reference frame you're using. If you're following an inertial frame backwards through time you're most likely to end up deep inside the Earth, actually, because that would put you in a sort of orbit.
I don't think that's any better.
It's not. The good news is it's sucking you in like a high pressure opening doesn't, and at least your end isn't falling, so that's probably not how the magic works.
The other trope-based possibility is it leaves you roughly where you geographically are in your new era. That's limiting as hell if you're somewhere with a short history like I am, which I guess is another argument to go recent.