Green - An environmentalist community

5315 readers

1 users here now

This is the place to discuss environmentalism, preservation, direct action and anything related to it!

RULES:

1- Remember the human

2- Link posts should come from a reputable source

3- All opinions are allowed but discussion must be in good faith

Related communities:

Unofficial Chat rooms:

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

196

The Comforting Lie of "Climate-Friendly Meat" (newrepublic.com)

submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

80 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Ah, yes, that pillar of good practices, US, where corn is so heavily subsidized its by-products had to be force injected into the entire food chain to justify it, to the point all food is rendered sweet by default.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I know it’s popular but believe it or not, the US isn’t the cause of all the world’s problems.

Only 23% of ag land worldwide is used to grow crops for direct human consumption. That’s lower than the US number by the way.

The fact remains that if you actually care about reducing farmland and fertilizer use, you’d go vegan.

Or was I right and that was just a throwaway comment meant to make you feel better about your habits?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Let's go back to examples I have at hand (I'm in Portugal and live in a somewhat rural area).

50 to 60 sixty years back, there was a lot more cattle roaming the area, as this was wool country. Even then, through field rotation, the production/consumption of feed was close to zero (abundant rains, predictable sunny intervals) allowed for fields to produce using what was at hand for fertilizer.

Come the 90's, with the end of the wool industry, flocks reduce drastically but the production of feed crops and cereals remains the same, with marginal use of synthetic fertilizers.

Come the 2000's and the berry craze explodes, with large extensions of land converted into greenhouses or intensive growth fields, that divert and consume huge amounts of water and require tons of synthetic agrochemicals.

The problem with corn in the US we have it here with berry farms and common greenhouses, that actively refuse manures and composts, thus injecting amounts of nitrogen and phosphorous previously absent from the soil. I can widen the scope to include peach and plum orchards.

The only area we have identified has being satured with those elements is further south, again due to intensive tomato farming. And an area where cattle is also raised.

I'm not white washing my option: I want sustainable agricultural practices to become norm, not exception.