18
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Different viewpoint and perspective from pcmag

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Reddit further told PCMag: "It’s not OK to show people NSFW content when they don’t want to see it. In line with our Moderator Code of Conduct

Mods tagged subs NSFW before allowing people to spam porn, and reddit admins have been so stupid they turned subs back to SFW without removing porn first, so now anyone can see porn where they're not supposed to.

Who's breaking the code of conduct?

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

What they failed to mention too was that some communities (IIRC, it was r/mildlyinteresting) approved NSFW content that was only risqué pictures of vegetables, like fruits shaped like genitalia.

This article is just a rewording of u/Spez propaganda. It wouldn't surprise me if Ziff-Davis, owners of PCMag, are investors on Reddit. Condé Nast certainly is, which explain why yesterdays article on Ars-Technica shares the same propagandistic tones.

load more comments (9 replies)
this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2023
18 points (95.0% liked)

Reddit

13591 readers
3 users here now

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS