this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2023
611 points (97.8% liked)
Funny
6668 readers
312 users here now
General rules:
- Be kind.
- All posts must make an attempt to be funny.
- Obey the general sh.itjust.works instance rules.
- No politics or political figures. There are plenty of other politics communities to choose from.
- Don't post anything grotesque or potentially illegal. Examples include pornography, gore, animal cruelty, inappropriate jokes involving kids, etc.
Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I agree with the no holding up traffic law since it drives me crazy seeing someone in the left lane going 10 under but that doesn't really work. Speaking from experience, many companies have drive cams that will tattle if they're speeding, following too closely (ridiculous distances too, like 10+ seconds), braking too hard, accelerating too hard, not coming to full stops and sitting for at least 2 seconds, etc. With everybody wanting to drive 10+ over they tend to get aggressive towards people in these vehicles when they're just trying not to get fired. It adds lots of frustration to the driver. Police should be enforcing speed limits first then those what I call "moving road obstacles". If they're not going to drive the speed limit then get the fuck out of the way.
It works fine in places like Germany. If you want to go slow, stay to the right.
The specific law should be that you're holding up traffic if there's room to move right while maintaining speed, and it's always illegal to pass on the right. The first addresses people going 10 under in the passing lane(s) and the second targets aggressive drivers. Imo, speed limits shouldn't be enforced unless it's actually causing public safety issues (e.g. 10-20 over is fine if everyone goes that fast, the issue is relative speed difference).