184
submitted 8 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] -5 points 8 months ago

It absolutely does imo, it legitimises itself through an appeal to an underlying moral framework.

Yes, but very indirectly. We don't have a "moral police", but one that enforces laws which are, as you say, legitimized by the people as a sovereign.

So you don't see police stopping people on "moral grounds" in some vague interpretation.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

What about abortion? Tracking if women are pregnant and hunting them down if then stop being pregnant.

[-] [email protected] -2 points 8 months ago

Usually codified by lawy not prosecuted as "immoral behaviour" as such. Although if you look at recent anti-abortion legislation in the US it is intentionally vague. That shifts some burden of interpretation to the executive branch and is a sign of authoritarianism I'd say.

this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2023
184 points (83.3% liked)

World News

32075 readers
803 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS