this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2023
74 points (90.2% liked)

Canada

7203 readers
245 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago (3 children)

@theacharnian
There's a difference between Pro-Palestnian views and Pro-Hamas views.

Hamas isn't even an internationally recognized government of palestine, and recognized by many countries including Canada as the terrorist organization. I still don't understand why there is some people who refer to two interchangeably.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

For sure. I will scream fuck Hamas until my voice goes hoarse.

The problem is the grey zone where it there is no clear line. Is using the word "genocide" crossing a line? Is using a rhetorical inversion of that line from Likud's 1977 manifesto ("from the river to the sea") crossing a line? Is "free Palestine" crossing a line? I don't think so. But the article has examples like that.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Calling "from the river to the sea" an "inversion of Likud's manifesto" is a talking point. Take a time machine and go talk to hard line Likudniks of the past 50 years, you will hear plenty of colorful and distasteful slogans, but not that one. For decades pro-Palestinians have shouted it, rallied around it; they own it, no one else. Just like the Israelis own "we need to delete Gaza" - it is not "an inversion of Iran's call to wipe Israel off the map".

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

It takes a very fearful settler mentality to interpret "will be free" as "murder the Jews". In particular the kind of mentality that would write something like "the establishment of a "Palestinian State," jeopardizes the security of the Jewish population" (same manifesto).

On the other hand "between the Sea and the Jordan there will only be Israeli sovereignty" is very very explicit.

Talking points? I don't know. When someone says who they are, believe them.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 11 months ago

Now now it's only racist when brown people say it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

I still don’t understand why there is some people who refer to two interchangeably.

The same reason there are people who call anything anti-Zionist "anti-semitic". Take that as you will, but to me it is a means to scare and silence people.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The extremists on both sides (very much including Hamas) can get fucked. Especially since they have effectively worked together.