this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2023
120 points (94.8% liked)

Technology

58754 readers
4667 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

This porn company makes millions by shaming porn consumers::Strike 3 Holdings says it's the creator of 'artistic' and 'inspiring' pornography. Some judges call it a copyright troll that makes millions by threatening to out those who download its films.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 15 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

I'm sorry, it's okay because they use BitTorrent? wtf? As I recall, the company argue in court that a mere IP address is enough to proceed with a lawsuit. They already try to ruin lives, this is more of the same.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The defendant can't afford for them to go to court, additionally, it goes to discovery and names are revealed. Paying is cheaper and safer.

This is not a lawsuit, its extortion, but if it went to court, it definitely would be defeated by anti-SLAPP laws.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So the litigant is filling lawsuits against IP addresses or did they ask the ISP for the customers info? Not trying to take the side of "Big Porn" but I have a hard time defending something that's clearly against the law. By all means steal porn but get a VPN or something.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

They have done both in the past. Source is Lawful Masses with Leonard French

They can fail to legally compel an ISP for customer info (or the individual paying for the service) because an IP address doesn't specifically link to one person. At best it links to a router, in a house with a single occupant who pays the ISP. That still doesn't guarantee the owner is the one who used the network at the time (could share internet with visiting guests, neighbors or be a victim of hacking). Often there are multiple people in the house, or it's an apartment, or it's freaking public access. An IP recorded from a file sharing protocol infers diddly squat but judges are not known for being adapt at computer literacy, an IP is sometimes enough for it to proceed.