this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2023
62 points (97.0% liked)

Hacker News

4123 readers
1 users here now

This community serves to share top posts on Hacker News with the wider fediverse.

Rules0. Keep it legal

  1. Keep it civil and SFW
  2. Keep it safe for members of marginalised groups

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

There is a discussion on Hacker News, but feel free to comment here as well.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Well, touch controls on appliances make more sense because they should last way longer than mechanical buttons, and it's not dangerous for you to focus your attention on them like it would be while driving.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

they should last way longer than mechanical buttons

Sorry what lol

[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Mechanical buttons wear out, touch buttons do not

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Lol there are mechanical buttons who still work who outlive any touchscreen alive today by 200 years, what are you talking about lol?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

First of all, touch buttons don't necessarily mean touch screens. Second, survivorship bias.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

First of all, I absolutely do not believe that a capacitive sensor + control circuitry + whatever firmware that requires + the OS that I’m sure is running somewhere inside the device + the myriads of technically unnecessary software + OTA update functionality + IoT (the S is for security) integration + enormous attack surface as a result of all of the preceding points is going to last longer or work more reliably than a robustly-engineered switch or rheostat. Second, planned obsolescence is a fairly recent “innovation”.