this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2023
23 points (100.0% liked)

Buttcoin

397 readers
1 users here now

Buttcoin is the future of online butts. Buttcoin is a peer-to-peer butt. Peer-to-peer means that no central authority issues new butts or tracks butts.

A community for hurling ordure at cryptocurrency/blockchain dweebs of all sorts. We are only here for debate as long as it amuses us. Meme stocks are also on topic.

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

DID is fucking amazing. I spent years following the blockchain identity scam, which is basically to sell centralized management of a "decentralised" identity system, such that you can't be blamed if it doesn't work and you get paid.

Decentralised identity is a scam. Either customer service is possible, meaning central control, or you lose your entire bureaucratic identity when you drop your iphone in a puddle. It turns out the dreams of libertarians are incoherent

The DID spec is basically not specified - anything that does anything is per-vendor. So for a long time, the only implementation of DID was Microsoft's, with a hard dependency on an Active Directory server at Azure.

Bluesky was started by rationalist neoreactionary coiners, so they tried blockchaining. They needed an ID spec and thought "DID's a spec, right?" The Bluesky (or AT Protocol) implementation is that your ID on their completely decentralised social network - decentralisation coming real soon! - is not name@server, but a hash stored at a central server that Bluesky runs. Now you might think that Bluesky's completely decentralised social network has extremely centralised control of a very important aspect of things. Bluesky's implementation has no blockchainery left to it - but they directly credit the dumb W3C spec.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

the fucking DID spec! for some reason I spent a weekend drinking and reading the DID spec and one of its even worse offshoots and it’s all filler. the offshoot spec spent more time describing the icon compliant apps should use than anything technical! and lately I keep seeing DID get dug up by random people trying to get it shoved into activitypub for no reason! the fucking things the crypto fuckers did to technical writing… and now the AI fuckers are doing even worse to scientific writing

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'm not looking but was it the DID spec that included critically important information like how to pronounce their jargon words?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

that’s the one! I can’t remember the title of the spec for the life of me but now I’m tempted to try and find it on masto

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

oh my god I fucking found it https://identity.foundation/didcomm-messaging/spec/ this needs to be a buttcoin thread (it may have already been a TechTakes thread too? but it deserves another look)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I think I recall seeing something in a subthread somewhere, can't remember if that was here or elsewhere on fedi

definitely worthy of its own thread too, based on some of the stuff I've seen people mention