this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2023
18 points (87.5% liked)

Fight For Privacy

296 readers
1 users here now

Fight For Privacy

A community to post, discuss and fight for our privacy.

Post Title Rule

Tag what the post is:

Post examples

Language: English

Rules

  1. Keep the topic on privacy
  2. Be respectful and tolerant
  3. When posting link use tools like CleanURL to get rid of trackers
  4. When posting numbers or statements, you need to link the source
  5. Promotion of products/brands are forbidden
  6. Politics not regarding privacy is forbidden, keep it on laws/decisions that concern privacy
  7. If possible post Invidious links instead of YouTube

[email protected]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
18
[DISCUSSION] Federation with Threads? (feddit.ch)
submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
7 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Not sure if this is the right community to post this in, as we don't have any [email protected] or similar community, but it seemed the most relevant. Sorry if it doesn't belong.

I'm sure that at this point it has become common knowledge that , Meta's alternative to Twitter, is trying to implement ActivityPub into their site. If/when this goes through, this would make Threads an instance admin, giving then full access to all the data that is available to other instance admins. This would include all data that belongs to Lemmy/KBin/Mastodon/etc users.

My main question is, should we let them do this? Should we federate with them if/when they come online, or should we defederate? I know that does not usually defederate with others (we currently only have one instance blocked, bottom of ), but in this case, this is Meta we're dealing with. They aren't exactly a big fan of data privacy, which is the whole theme of this instance (our sidebar: "This instance is focused on providing security and privacy for its users").

It seems that most people on Lemmy/etc. seem to be in favour of pre-emptive defederation and that many other instances have already defederated (Lemmy.ca, dbzer0, Blahaj, Beehaw, Lemm.ee).

There may also be another solution, but I'm not sure whether this applies to Lemmy.

What does everyone else think? Should we stay federated with them? Should we defederate, like other instances have already done? Should we wait and see? I'd love to hear others' opinions on this.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Sadly I can't find the comment-feed I had with the admin (was a year ago +/-), but yes as far as I remember the admin does not want to defederate other instances. Which is also a stance I understand, especially with the neutral mentality Switzerland has (and this is a Swiss instance after all).

I hope the admin comments so we can see the thoughts itself and not some phrases I remember hazily :)

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

I think i chime in for some comment. You got it right, i believe this open platform should stay as open as possible. But if i see that problems arise and users from this instance are having issues because of Threads or other platforms, i have to take action. And of course, there are borders to this openness.

I'm very aware, that Meta and the other big corporations are interested in our data and want to use them for their profit. But i don't think that defederation will stop them. They will harvest our data anyway, with just simple web crawlers.

I support anyone who wants to defederate them, but i also want an open platform for people to have a place to express themselves and communicate. And with the new instance block feature of lemmy v.0.19, people are able to hide specific instances themself, if they do not like their content.