16
submitted 9 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

TheGuardian.com

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 24 points 9 months ago

That’s basically the only reason Ole Joe has stuck around.

He basically straight-up said that:

If Trump wasn’t running, I’m not sure I’d be running

  • Joe Biden
[-] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago

Yeah, but he also said in that same interaction that "at least 50" other Dems can beat him.

So its not that he thinks he's the only one that can beat trump and that's why he's running.

It's either a pride thing, or similar to Hillary he thinks trump is the easiest possible opponent and he's will to risk it so he can be president

[-] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

I think you’re misunderstanding those two phrases.

“I think I can beat trump” and “50 democrats at beat me” does not mean that “50 democrats can beat trump”.

Primaries are different than general elections.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

...

In what world would the "him" Joe Biden is saying 50 other Dems can beat referring to anyone besides trump?

And why are you talking about primaries?

The party won't support a primary against Bide as an incumbent. So there just flat out isn't going to even be a primary.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

I think it's spite.

this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2023
16 points (57.1% liked)

politics

18881 readers
4041 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS