this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2023
450 points (99.1% liked)

News

23287 readers
4022 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The Supreme Court said Wednesday it will consider whether to restrict access to a widely used abortion drug — even in states where the procedure is still allowed.

The case concerns the drug mifepristone that — when coupled with another drug — is one of the most common abortion methods in the United States.

The decision means the conservative-leaning court will again wade into the abortion debate after overturning Roe v. Wade last year, altering the landscape of abortion rights nationwide and triggering more than half the states to outlaw or severely restrict the procedure.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 27 points 10 months ago (4 children)

I suspect the Court is politically savvy enough to avoid making mifepristone illegal right before the election. They'll make a soft open-ended decision that leaves it unrestricted and come back to it in a few years, then make it illegal.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Have you been living under a rock for the last couple of decades? The newest chucklefucks appointed to SCOTUS don't give two shits about appearances and will do whatever they want at any time.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They care a lot about appearances, what they don't care about is actual popular opinion or democracy.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago (2 children)

If they cared about appearances they'd adopt a code of ethics.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 10 months ago

They did though, right?

One that has no mechanisms of enforcement, which makes it exclusively about appearances.

I think you have a good point though: we shouldn't be surprised when they make another egregious ruling.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

That's a lot of trust.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

youre more optimistic than me. to me, they pull an unpopular move in a time when trump isn't likely to win, wait four years, until a non-Trump conservative gets the nomination - win.

or they do it and trump wins anyway- win.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 10 months ago

Optimistic? I think a favorable ruling on this issue will be weaponized to deflate anti-Trump voters. "See? You were worried about nothing, the Supreme Court is still a legitimate institution."

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I suspect the Court is politically savvy enough to avoid making mifepristone illegal right before the election.

That question isn't before the court and making mifepristone illegal isn't even a potential outcome of this case.