this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2023
1793 points (98.2% liked)

pics

19663 readers
1355 users here now

Rules:

1.. Please mark original photos with [OC] in the title if you're the photographer

2..Pictures containing a politician from any country or planet are prohibited, this is a community voted on rule.

3.. Image must be a photograph, no AI or digital art.

4.. No NSFW/Cosplay/Spam/Trolling images.

5.. Be civil. No racism or bigotry.

Photo of the Week Rule(s):

1.. On Fridays, the most upvoted original, marked [OC], photo posted between Friday and Thursday will be the next week's banner and featured photo.

2.. The weekly photos will be saved for an end of the year run off.

Weeks 2023

Instance-wide rules always apply. https://mastodon.world/about

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Correct. That's how most 35mm projectors work as well. The film feeds out from the middle of one platter, through the projector then onto a return platter where it spools from the center out. But if the tail of the film (which is on the outer edge) comes loose and falls off the edge it could cause the entire print to spin off the edge of the platter, one layer at a time. It's like a slinky, the weight of the film falling will make it fall faster and faster. It would end up in a big circular pile that would be an absolute nightmare to get back on the platter.

There's nothing worse than coming into the booth and finding hundreds of feet of film tangled on the ground.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah, that's interesting and definitely sounds like an awful mess to deal with. Thanks for sharing, I'm not as familiar with film projection.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Thank you for taking a few moments to learn about it yourself! The link you provided to the Imax video wasn't one I'd seen before, and I love watching that kind of shit.