this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2023
78 points (84.8% liked)

Apple

17451 readers
186 users here now

Welcome

to the largest Apple community on Lemmy. This is the place where we talk about everything Apple, from iOS to the exciting upcoming Apple Vision Pro. Feel free to join the discussion!

Rules:
  1. No NSFW Content
  2. No Hate Speech or Personal Attacks
  3. No Ads / Spamming
    Self promotion is only allowed in the pinned monthly thread

Lemmy Code of Conduct

Communities of Interest:

Apple Hardware
Apple TV
Apple Watch
iPad
iPhone
Mac
Vintage Apple

Apple Software
iOS
iPadOS
macOS
tvOS
watchOS
Shortcuts
Xcode

Community banner courtesy of u/Antsomnia.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 13 points 11 months ago (2 children)

And Apple will work tirelessly, and litigate endlessly, to stop this from happening.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

I’ve been using Beeper for almost two years now on desktop to view my iMessages, discord, and slack all in one app, and Apple hasn’t said or done shit about it yet

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That’s not the same. Beeper mini uses reverse engineering, beeper just uses Mac minis sitting in a datacenter somewhere.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Per the Beeper CTO, evidently Beeper (cloud) isn't using the Mac minis anymore for anyone who migrated to their latest bridge. It's using the same solution, they just didn't make a big deal out of it at the time. I've actually been on the new bridge since early November and haven't had any issues. In my case the new bridge fixed an issue I was having with SMS forwarding from my iPhone.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

thanks for the correction!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

WOOOO! Great to know.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I read somewhere that RE for the sake of improving communications is allowed, or something along those lines.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

Reverse engineering for the sake of ensuring compatibility. It’s not limited to communication.