this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2023
129 points (96.4% liked)

News

23367 readers
3133 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

NEW YORK (AP) — Most business economists think the U.S. economy could avoid a recession next year, even if the job market ends up weakening under the weight of high interest rates, according to a survey released Monday.

Only 24% of economists surveyed by the National Association for Business Economics said they see a recession in 2024 as more likely than not. The 38 surveyed economists come from such organizations as Morgan Stanley, the University of Arkansas and Nationwide.

Such predictions imply the belief that the Federal Reserve can pull off the delicate balancing act of slowing the economy just enough through high interest rates to get inflation under control, without snuffing out its growth completely.

High rates work to slow inflation by making borrowing more expensive and hurting prices for stocks and other investments. The combination typically slows spending and starves inflation of its fuel. So far, the job market has remained remarkably solid despite high interest rates, and the unemployment rate sat at a low 3.9% in October.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

No, that would be like people re-defining all sickness to be a cold, and then getting annoyed when their doctors tell them that Chlamydia is not, in fact, a cold and won't be cured by time and Tylenol.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

No I had it right the first time, but thanks for your "help". I know what YOU economists did and don't need you to explain your version of events.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

..... No, you fucked it up both times

If you think professionals defining the terms of their profession is outrageous, graduating high school is gonna drop a brick on your head

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Lol, aight bud, you keep going on thinking you invent definitions of words used by people in jobs you dont work

That will get you as far as a fly pisses, but dont let that stop ya

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Even economists don't like to use the exact same metrics and parameters to "define" a recession every time. And most importantly, a significant portion like to do it after the fact. Because saying something like "a lack of growth for x consecutive quarters", etc, doesn't cover all possibilities.

Cue all the people that think a single definition they learned about is the only one that exists and should exist for no discernable practical reason.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

"I dunno why we let doctors define all our illnesses." Yeah it might be cause they are more informed on the nuance of their work to know what defined the terms

Shocks me the confidence some folk have about topics theyve never studied

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Apples and oranges. Economics has always struggled with mathematical rigor because it's a highly dynamic system with too many variables that are impossible to control if only to study well, so our understanding of it and how to shape it is still growing. Most importantly, it doesn't have the same level of certainty in its claims from a scientific perspective as a panel of doctors would have in discussing illnesses. There's also the difference in political stakes. The economy is doing the same no matter whether you are able to affix a label on it or not (that many economists won't want to decide on until it's behind us). We're just arguing on whether we get to use that label, when most people in the U.S. are struggling. They're focusing on what affects them, whereas economists are also looking at a bigger range of other factors, including how businesses and the higher classes are faring. This is where the divide comes from. At the end of the day, you're not going to convince most people they aren't in pain, because they are, based on metrics they don't care about.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago

Wait, sorry, you were agreeing with the other guy who thinks economists shouldnt be the people defining economic terms?

So, what, you think dentists should be defining economic terms? Plumbers?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Sorry about economist apologist. Better?