Which license leads to more contribution: MIT or GPL? (monero.town)

submitted 9 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Suppose I want my project to have as many contributors as possible. Generally do you think more people are inclined to contribute (upstream) if the code is permissive or copyleft or do you think it doesn't really matter?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] [email protected] 33 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I am happier when I see copyleft but let’s be honest, I would contribute to an interesting, useful project regardless of their choice between MIT and GPL. Same for companies: some prefer MIT, but there is no way they are not going to contribute to the Linux Kernel just because of copyleft. So bottom line is: make something that people enjoy/find useful and see contributors flocking.

CLAs are a different matter: I do not contribute to projects which ask you to assign them copyright unless I 100% trust the organisation behind them.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

What does CLA mean?

[-] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contributor_License_Agreement

this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2023

42 points (97.7% liked)

Open Source

30324 readers

2098 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]