269
submitted 9 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago

Media Bias Fact Check is less reputable than pretty much every site they report on.

They have no credentials to establish their credibility. Seriously, try to find any anything about the people running the site.

[-] [email protected] -2 points 9 months ago

Have you? Seems to be founded by a guy called Dave Van Zandt. There is a pretty extensive wikipedia article about the site. It does not seem to be the mighty tool for everything, but there are even scientific studies using that tool.

I mean seriously, why are you doing this?

[-] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

What credentials does this "Dave Van Zandt" have. What evidence is there that support his credibility?

Scientific studies use it because it's a dataset. Do you want me to point you to the hundreds of shitty datasets that people have used in the past for machine learning work?

[-] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

You claimed that you can't find anything about the person behind that website, I obviously proved you wrong.

If you want an honest debate I'd suggest to add something constructive instead of only asking questions.

You can ask the same for any other person, institution or news agency.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Everything about the author is what's posted on the website. There's no evidence to back it up: no record of graduation, no evidence of a degree. Dude could say anything and there would be no way to validate it.

That's not true for institutions or news agencies, where the journalists have very public records.

this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2023
269 points (93.2% liked)

World News

32091 readers
671 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS