195
this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2023
195 points (99.5% liked)
Technology
59436 readers
3684 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
TL;DR 100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up, because cable pushed back on 100 symmetrical.
This is just so people can't self host media, right? Why else would they obsessively cap upload speeds?
DOCSIS (AKA internet service over coaxial cable) deals in some number of bonded channels, meaning portions of the total available bandwidth on the wire. They asymmetrically allocate channels to download speeds to overcome the limitations of the older copper wire technology. 100Mbps symmetrical is beyond what most of their existing "Broadband" infrastructure can support in rural and underserved areas, so they complained about it being unreasonable. 100Mbps symmetrical is certainly possible over DOCSIS, but speeds are only as fast as the weakest link... And there are a helluva lot of weak links outside of high population density areas.
Yes, that grant money bought their executives more vacation homes and sports cars. They keep getting more grant money despite not using it for improving their infrastructure. If it was used correctly, most places would have fiber by now.
It's almost like the game is rigged on their favor.
A lot of greed
Ah ok, that makes sense at least.
I have 960Mbps/50Mbps over DOCSIS at home, but I live in the middle of the city.