datahoarder

6758 readers

1 users here now

Who are we?

We are digital librarians. Among us are represented the various reasons to keep data -- legal requirements, competitive requirements, uncertainty of permanence of cloud services, distaste for transmitting your data externally (e.g. government or corporate espionage), cultural and familial archivists, internet collapse preppers, and people who do it themselves so they're sure it's done right. Everyone has their reasons for curating the data they have decided to keep (either forever or For A Damn Long Time). Along the way we have sought out like-minded individuals to exchange strategies, war stories, and cautionary tales of failures.

We are one. We are legion. And we're trying really hard not to forget.

-- 5-4-3-2-1-bang from this thread

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Mechanical or SSD for offsite storage that’s updated at least yearly? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 11 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

28 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I have about 100gb and growing that is critical for my business. File size growth is slow, so it will be years and years before it even gets to 200gb.

I have multiple local copies and a copy in google drive, but I want to leave a hard drive at my mother-in-law’s house.

I only want 2.5 form factor or smaller as my mother-in-law will be carrying it here when she comes to visit us on the city.

I’m not sure what the recommendation is. I’m not a millionaire, I’m just freelance. So, I’d like to minimize cost.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

If you want a 2.5" form factor and plan on moving it in any sort of way, SSD is the way to go.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I thought mechanical drives are Ok to move around if they are powered off.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah but we're talking 2.5 inch drives, and we're talking about less than a terabyte of storage. There is no good reason to pick a physical drive HDD over an SSD when they're practically the same price at that storage level. SSDs are simply safer to move, there are no moving parts, dropping an SSD isn't that concerning, dropping an HDD can easily kill it. I mean think of this this way. There IS a physical reader that goes across the entire disk. That doesn't exist in an SSD. It's hard to do, but you can realistically take a hard drive and just SHAKE it to death with your hand, make the reader fall out of place. While shaking a solid state is more like just shaking a giant flash drive.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Thanks! I decided to go the ssd route. It’s priced about the same as a usb drive of the same capacity and I have spare enclosures.