this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2023
412 points (88.4% liked)

linuxmemes

21304 readers
1383 users here now

Hint: :q!

Sister communities:

Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
    • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
    • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
    •  

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't fork-bomb your computer.

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
    [email protected]
    [email protected]
    [email protected]
    412
    big deal (jlai.lu)
    submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
    94 comments fedilink hide all child comments
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I think the only reason people really have for calling it GNU/Linux is to raise awareness about the Free Software movement and its agenda.

    The line between "kernel" and "the rest of the OS" is and has always been a fuzzy one. I think RMS would consider GCC to be part of the OS, but I've never seen an Android device with a compiler installed. (And I've sometimes done *GNU/*Linux installations and never gone on to install GCC, though usually I end up installing GCC at some point.)

    I don't think it's more "correct" to call it "GNU/Linux" than "Linux" per se. (After all, if we're going down that rabbithole, should I be calling it "Syslinux/Systemd/etc/etc/etc/GNU/Linux?")

    But, if you're ideologically aligned with the Free Software movement and want to see more awareness of its mission (and full disclosure, that describes me) then by all means, call it "GNU/Linux" if you like.

    All that said, I do think a lot of folks who insist on calling it "GNU/Linux" strongly believe not only that it's good for awareness about Free Software, but also that it's more "correct" to call it "GNU/Linux."

    And I'll also say I can kindof understand why people might feel it's more correct. From RMS' perspective, he and some other folks were off building an OS and they had it mostly done and people started using the GNU work with a Linux kernel. But still, that historical argument holds less water every year.

    [–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

    I'm more or less philosophically and ideologically aligned with the FSF, but don't really want to bring attention to them as they seem far more interested in ideological purity than actually doing good work or being actually useful, which is a massive turn off for most people.

    They're also still doggedly aligned with RMS who's, honestly, a hot mess. At best, he's embarrassing and off-putting and would rather argue over Linux vs "gu-new slash Linux" (and insisting on pronouncing gnu incorrectly and citing a song that was actually making fun of people pronouncing it that way) than talk about things that actually matter for the cause, and will refuse to work with anyone who doesn't do things his way (and at worst... Well, there's all the stuff that got him temporarily kicked out of the FSF, and them bringing him back after that all came out was not good for the community).

    Ideological purity is actually harmful to the free sharing of knowledge and ideas, which is what they claim to be for.

    [–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

    Depending what exactly you mean by "ideological purity," I might somewhat disagree with you.

    I definitely want there to (continue to) exist an organization pushing for all software to be FOSS. If the Free Software movement didn't exist but the OSS movement did, I expect there'd be much less FOSS out there. There are a lot of projects out there that don't have a good OSS movement reason for existing. Coreboot, for instance. Arguably to a large extent Wine as well. And LineageOS and GrapheneOS. And OpenWRT. Not to mention ~(GNU/)~Linux itself. I don't imagine most OSS folks to be quite so motivated to want fully-FOSS-from-soup-to-nuts kind of options as Free Software folks are.

    There are plenty of software companies publishing more proprietary software for Linux and plenty of OSS folks heralding that as a huge win. For the most part, I see that as unfortunate. And I have reasons why that I can point to that wouldn't be seen (well... quite as much, at least) as tinfoil-hat levels of paranoia.

    And then there's copyleft. I think that's a fuckin' great thing that's needed more now than ever, but (and I don't know for sure... correct me if you think I'm wrong, but) I think that's more of a thing among Free Software folks than among Open Source folks.

    And I don't think any of the above could have come about or at least been quite as prominent today as they are without such an ideologically-motivated movement. The FSF put a very aggressive line in the sand saying "proprietary software shouldn't exist." Basically the main thing that distinguishes the OSS movement from the Free Software movement is tolerance of proprietary software.

    Also, I don't really know for sure the extent to which this is actually the case for OSS folks as a whole, but ESR's "the solution to everything is more capitalism" is pretty fucked up.

    That said, I 110% agree the Free Software movement needs to be doing mostly everything it can to distance itself from RMS.

    [–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

    I haven't seen RMS defined anywhere in these threads

    [–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

    Richard M. Stallman. Origin of the whole idea of "Free Software," founder of the Free Software Foundation and GNU Project, guy who said some of Epstein's sex trafficking victims probably enjoyed it.

    Oh, and ESR is Eric Raymond, cofounder of the Open Source Initiative and rabid Libertarian.

    [–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

    I wonder if they ever regretted opting for a microkernel design.