144
The creepy AI-driven surveillance that may be infiltrating your workplace
(www.businessinsider.com)
this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2023
144 points (97.4% liked)
Technology
58754 readers
4513 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
may? its been here for awhile. they already have the data. your work machine is already being monitored for basic telemetry/metrics. they are just getting better at analysis and commoditization of tech so it can reach the masses (re:small business) cheaply.
Yep.
I've been in enterprise IT for decades, with friends in SMB IT, and we often discuss the ongoing migration of enterprise grade stuff (hardware, software, processes, paradigms, etc) to the SMB space.
Some is good (like management/leadership, team building, etc. You know, the soft skills in this article). Other stuff can be problematic. Cloud-everything for example. Vendors (looking at you, MS), have painted SMB into a corner with licensing so cloud looks much more attractive.
What SMB management often ignores is now your business can be held hostage by your cloud provider, who, while they may claim your data is encrypted, are certainly surveilling everything that isn't. When they decide to raise rates, or remove features, what are you going to do?
God, I'd love to create a competitor to Quickbooks in the OSS space.
It's off-topic for this thread, but as a fellow IT professional, the incessant push to cloud-ify everything is frustrating as hell. It's like all concepts of "does this make sense for my use case?" no longer exist. Cloud is NOT always better, and I'd argue that in many instances, it is just plain worse than going with a local, on-prem solution.
We're very much on the same page. Seeing the SMB's get sucked into cloud because on-prem has hardware costs is really frustrating. I blame bean-counter, because hardware is a capital expenditure and cloud is like leasing something.
The short-term financials look good, but disregards the risks and costs of going to cloud. That my SMB IT friends don't make this more clear to their clients is really frustrating.
Backup is a great use-case for cloud, you address the risk of local problems, so I get that. But office 365/email/outlook? No thanks. But MS just makes it so much cheaper/easier, especially for SMB.
Agreed on all points. Backup is indeed often a great candidate for cloud. Like you said, it's usually cheaper and safer in the long run and addresses all the checklist items you'd have to implement locally for redundancies and security.
All these vendors forcing us to move to a rent based economy is tiresome.