this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2023
10 points (91.7% liked)

Selfhosted

40154 readers
641 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Hi, I wanted to host a personal Lemmy instance online (for just myself, I don't think I can take the upkeep for other users - please let me know if this is not possible) and wanted to understand how to "attach" a CDN service to it.

The idea behind doing this is that I'm in the US but I'm looking to host a server in Europe. I am looking into Cloudflare's free CDN service, but it would be great if someone could point me towards how I can configure this setup to speed up the loading time for my Lemmy instance (which is going to be far away from me, geographically).

I would also like to know about your setups and how you have hosted Lemmy.

Thanks!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thank you for your comment!

I am opting for the very low cost providers like Racknerd and CloudServer (see: $1 VPS offerings) - which host most of their servers outside the US.

Thank you for the explanation, I would like to know more about the "effort" from Lemmy's side to let Cloudflare cache content before it is requested.

CF needs to dynamically control where requests for your server end up, and for that they need to be the authoritative DNS for it.

Could you explain this point a bit more? Why would Cloudflare need to control DNS for my domain? How is this linked to them proxying my traffic? I've been trying to understand this for a bit now - how does having CF's own nameservers let CF proxy my traffic?

I was also considering hosting Lemmy in my own network, but I can't seem to find any guides on which ports to forward - if I could just find a decent guide on the networking required to host Lemmy I might even do it on-prem.

Thanks a bunch!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Using Cloudflare nameservers helps to proxy your traffic because if proxying is enabled ("orange cloud") those servers aren't handing out your IP address to people who request your domain, they're handing out addresses belonging to Cloudflare machines near the visitor instead. They have machines in data centers all around the world, and they would like the traffic to end up in the data center closest to where it's needed.

Doing that means they can do stuff like reduce cross-region network traffic: for instance, if your VPS is in Europe but a bunch of visitors from the US suddenly request a certain image on your site (because you've just posted to a popular community, perhaps), they only need to have that image data cross the Atlantic once before they can serve it up many times in the US. Besides saving bandwidth that also allows it to be served faster to most visitors, because most requests for it are effectively served from a local data center instead of from one on another continent. They'll also continue to be able to serve your image even when your VPS is down for whatever reason, as long as it's already in cache.

Theoretically they could probably do all of that using CNAME records instead, I don't know why they don't. Maybe there's some technical reason or maybe they just prefer this slightly simpler setup. I suppose it would add an extra DNS roundtrip, but that wouldn't really be noticeable to most users.

(Most of that is probably oversimplified and but hopefully that clarifies it a bit)