574
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Rep. Eli Crane used the derogatory phrase in describing his proposed amendment to a military bill. Democratic Rep. Joyce Beatty asked that his words be stricken from the record.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's just very dated and has come to be seen as a non-politically correct slur, even though originally it WAS the politically correct language. I agree with you personally and feel like there are much bigger things to worry about than someone using an outdated politically correct euphemism. There have been so many, it's easy to get confused: negro, colored, minority, people of color, etc. I don't feel strongly about any of this and just say whatever I'm told is acceptable now, so it's not a big deal to me. I do think it would be cool if we could just say black white/asian/hispanic/whatever.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Problem is, when you let people like him slide when he's playing his little games, the games keep getting a little more grand. That's all it is to him. And now he gets to go "What??" When knows damn well semantics matter. He knows the little republican signals matter. They all know what they're doing.

Stand back and stand by

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Yup.

It's really bizarre how we all know what's going on here, but people insist on playing dumb about it.

"Please explain to me why using terminology that brings back memories about segregation is bad when the other terminology refers to the same group of people? I Just don't get it! It's not logical!"

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It’s just very dated

Exactly. It used to be the common politically correct terminology. I don't see how it can suddenly be called a "slur" any more than 'black' is a slur.

NAACP - National Association for the Advancement of Coloured People

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

The N word was also once politically correct

[-] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

It's such an odd word. Not like "fuck" or "cunt" or something like that. You are literally not allowed to write it or say it. I'm not even sure people let themselves think it, instead thinking "n word" inside their heads. I can't think of any other word that is so much like actual god-fearing blasphemy. And yet, you can buy a random rap album and the word will be all over it. It's even used as a term of endearment between black men who grew up together.

Can anyone think of any other word that is treated almost as if it has magical powers?

[-] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

How old are you? LOL

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

context matters, a white congress person is using a phrase in Congress that historically was used in Congress to deny people's rights. these politicians want to "make America great again" they want to undo civil rights.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

A word does not deny anybody's rights. "Coloured Person" is just as politically correct as "black" or "African American". In fact "Coloured Person" is the most accurate of the 3 politically correct terms.

[-] [email protected] -5 points 1 year ago

People suffering from neuroticism make up things to get angry about.

this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2023
574 points (92.6% liked)

politics

18894 readers
3036 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS