this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2023
119 points (89.9% liked)
Asklemmy
43833 readers
1150 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- [email protected]: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Another Canadian. I don't know the gun laws well, nor do I shoot, so I judge mostly based on the consequences.
Yes, we have gun violence, but it doesn't dominate the headlines daily. Homicides are still remarkable and mass shootings are still shocking. I suppose this means that we haven't made guns too easy to acquire, at least relative to the wishes of our population at large.
I don't think I need stricter controls, but I wouldn't support looser controls. I support things as they are, largely speaking. I'm prepared to be schooled by a fellow Canadian more in the know.
What I dearly wish to avoid are the conspiracy fantasies of the government coming to take our guns as well as a retroactive insertion of the myth that our country was born in, by, and through guns. It wasn't. As long as we avoid those two things well enough, we don't seem to need urgent change regarding gun controls.