this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2023
12 points (100.0% liked)
Astronomy
4122 readers
34 users here now
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Any experts out there want to weigh in on this? Sounds great in the article but I’m too much of a novice to identify potential drawbacks. Is it too good to be true?
What they're describing is a holographic lens, basically.
Holograms have the neat property that a holographic photograph of a lens will behave like a lens. You can skip a step and just imprint the idea of the lens into a holographic film directly without actually taking a photo, but the idea is the same.
The result is a sheet of something like glass or plastic, which can be as thin as you like, which behaves as if it were a huge glass lens which would have been so think you couldn't realistically use it.
It's a great idea, but very difficult to manufacture because you need to add something kind of similar to a fingerprint to the surface of your glass which is so small that the gap between ridges is smaller than the wavelength of light. That means they're only a couple of hundred nanometres apart (at most).
We can do that, but it's very difficult to do it correctly over the whole surface of a usefully large lens. I've known of people trying a decade ago, and they weren't getting anywhere fast