this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2023
234 points (98.8% liked)

Europe

8485 readers
1 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out [email protected]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

How is Australia ahead of Europe! We have Osko which allows instant transfer(seconds) upto $10,000 per day. It's fantastic.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The whole EU already has SEPA Instant Payments which allow the transfer of up to 100.000€ per transaction in under 3 seconds. This law is just about making it Default

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And free if I remember correctly. I never used it because my bank was like "Fees might apply". Trying to figure out which fees and how much was pretty much impossible.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

In Germany it’s generally 1€ per transaction 🀑

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In Greece is 4-6€ per transaction for every 100β‚¬πŸ˜Š (now we have created the interbanking system called IRIS which you can send money to an IBAN linked with your phone number for free)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I can’t wait for the day when consumers can cut banks out of their lives.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How would you get loans without banks?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

From the central bank at slightly above policy interest rates. Cutting out as many middlemen as possible should be imperative for our age of technology.

That is until we have gotten rid of the central banking system …

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nope. It's not. My Sparkasse charges nothing

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That’s rather the exception than the norm. All my banks charge 1€. All Sparkassen I researched you pay at least something:

https://www.sskm.de/de/home/service/echtzeit-ueberweisung.html

There it is 0.75€

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Here it is of my Sparkasse, 0€

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Don’t doubt that but as I said, this is the exception rather than the norm.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

That's a shame

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is the least weird aspect about the Sparkassen system. They served their purpose but are being obsolete these days.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

True, of course. But the Volksbanken are similar to the Sparkassen when it comes to confusing customers.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's not that it doesn't exist, but it's an extra paid option.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

On my main bank I don't have to pay extra for it, but it doesn't always work

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

For my bank, instant is free but requires the receiver to also have instant sepa support.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We're talking about payments across different countries. Inside each country payments have been instant for a while

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Not in Germany, at least not when using different banks.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Most banks have an instant payment option that comes with a fee.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Which is a fucking insult. The moment i pay anything with a debit card the payment is already noted in my account, just the formal transfer of the money hasn't happened yet. But both banks already know the transaction and they know that they will do the transaction, everything is there already. But they just didn't do the switch.

It is like you would go to an airport, have your luggaged checked in, go through the security, board the plane and everything is ready. Also the starting lane is empty. But the flight will wait until the next day, because thats how it has been done since the days of olde.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

It's also such a dumb idea to cut this feature. People will just substitute bank payments for PayPal.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I'm pretty sure this new ruling is only for bank transfers, not card payments.

Your card payment is technically instant, since you get the goods in the store at he same time as the money leaves your balance. Both parts agree that it happened. The waiting time until the store actually gets the money deposited in their bank isn't dependent on bank. First it sits in the terminal until it is reported to the card company at the end of day. Depending on the specific agreement they can then accrue several days of transactions before even starting doing the bank transfer. Some do it daily, but I don't know of anyone doing it more frequently than that. For debit cards that is. Other payment methods can be faster or slower, but it really isn't the bank to blame for this.

Bank transfers should be faster than card settlements. The current setup is that banks also acrue transactions and exchange them one or two times daily. This has one benefit for users, since at a known time, they can surely know that there won't be coming more payments that day. This information is f.i. usable for debt collectors. Doing faster payments is obviously better, but it will also mean that due times need to be specified by the hour and will probably cause some arguments about when a payment was actually done. Also even with faster payments, interest calculations are done on a daily basis, not hourly, so there'll still be a technical cut-off time that determines who actually had the money on that day even if it was moved to different accounts several times on a day. So sure, it may theoretically free up some money, but it won't make much practical difference anyway.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Then I would suggest switching. Even my Sparkasse which charges for everything through the nose doesn't charge anything for SEPA Instant Payments

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

In 2020 only 62,4% of the banks in the EU supported it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

That's not true for every bank. My bank supports instant payments (for free) regardless of the receiving bank.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Switzerland has had TWINT for almost a decade.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah there's iDeal in the Netherlands which is also instant

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah but that's the problem, each country has their own solution, with no interoperability. Whether it's MobilePay, Swish, Vips or PayPal or whatever, they are all only ubiquitous within their own country.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

Yeah that I agree with. I have to use Wise to do transfers between the US and EU and it's kinda clunky and the fees add up.