this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2023
204 points (93.2% liked)

Technology

59285 readers
4747 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
204
AI companies have all kinds of arguments against paying for copyrighted content (www.theverge.com)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
42 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's already the case. Copyright is only possible for creative works of human authorship. By definition AI generation is uncopyrightable.

[โ€“] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

First of all, copyleft and uncopyrightable are entirely different things.

Second, if something is a derived work of a copyleft work, then either it must also be copyleft, or it's simply infringement and entirely unusable. You're suggesting that AI remixing can effectively "remove" the copyleft, but it would be entirely unjust (and more to the point, contrary to established legal precedent) for it to work that way.