811
submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

TOS was utterly blatant, TNG not so much. What I'll agree to is that DSC was way too sappy, it failed to be scifi on so many levels.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

I haven't yet finished DSC yet but I highly disagree with that last bit. Every single Star Trek has been "Star Trek but..." They all do it very differently and that's what makes each one so incredibly interesting to watch as a group instead of just 1 long series. From what I've seen of DSC it's basically just "Star Trek but... It focuses on the characters" similarly to DS9 in that way.

A lot of great SciFi stories are just characters talking but it's in space.... That's most Asimov stories actually... so DSC is definitely sci-fi and very much so sci-fi.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I have no issue with character focus, it's that if I wanted to watch a romantic drama I wouldn't switch on trek. Some sprinkling, fine, but it has been front and centre, carried more by music than actual story or character development. You could plot the "ok we want to hit these emotional cues" spreadsheet that they wrote the story around, haphazardly.

SNW also has quite a romantic arc, heck, even a love triangle. I don't mind it there, it's actually done well and serves Spock's character development.

this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2023
811 points (96.7% liked)

Risa

6842 readers
45 users here now

Star Trek memes and shitposts

Come on'n get your jamaharon on! There are no real rules—just don't break the weather control network.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS