this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2023
1190 points (92.7% liked)

Political Memes

5452 readers
4245 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Let me remind you of my comment above

Again, the point is we’re not even there yet. We can theory craft all we want, and you can poke imaginary holes in every measure taken. And in the end, you will still reach the conclusion of “if it’s not perfect, why try?” and nothing will change.

So, why bother? No matter what solutions someone brings to the table, you will not be satisfied.

You proved that correct. There was no point to any of this.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

The conclusions I came to are as follows:

  1. You immediately resorted to name calling when you didn't like what I said... like some kind of petulant child.
  2. You make claims that we just need to "try" and then once a problem with your half-baked idea is presented, it became my fault
  3. I outright told you the point and you still missed it like a fucking moron.
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Assuming the thought experiment is reaching a system such as exists in many parts of the world including the UK and Canada, what do you think the best approach to achieve that, would be?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I honestly do not have a solution; that’s why I asked the question. Limiting ammunition sales significantly would help, that’s only part of it though.

There’s a second amendment to allow the right to bear arms, but I missed the part in the second amendment that makes any mention of a right to purchase ammo.

Ban the sale of all forms of gunpowder that can be used to remanufacture used rounds.

As far as solving the problem of getting semi automatic rifles out of the hands of people that should not have them goes, there’s only one method to do it, but busting into peoples’ homes and taking their stuff when they aren’t around isn’t likely to have 100% fantastic results either.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fair enough. I agree with your comment that at some point there’s going to be a shootout with SWAT if this happened, regardless of approach. Financial disincentives perhaps? Make it prohibitively expensive to buy ammunition?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Maybe tax the shit out of ammo and make the tax 100% fund hormone replacement therapy; or just something else nice to do for trans-folks…

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe more appropriately, towards mental health services. And the circle is complete.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I don’t think that the tax going on to pay for mental health services would act to disincentivize or dissuade from the purchase of ammo; it would be quite useful though. Maybe that’s better.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Minus points for name calling and hypocrisy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The name calling was to one person; and in response to name calling.

Care to point out the hypocrisy?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Calling him out for name calling then nar calling.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Sorry, I tend to speak to people on the level they speak to me.