this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2023
838 points (98.7% liked)

Science Memes

11440 readers
276 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
838
Roots of Mother Appalachia (mander.xyz)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
73 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

https://www.cntraveler.com/story/appalachian-mountains-may-have-once-been-as-tall-as-the-himalayas

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You didn't queue up twice when they were handing out verbal reasoning skills..

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Mountains.age !> dinosaurs.age, thus mountains.age <= dinosaurs.age

mountains.age > bones.age

So dinosaurs.age => mountains.age > bones.age

And dinosaurs.age > bones.age

His logical reasoning skills are sound though, as is his sarcastic humor.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe, this sentence, out of context. The rest of the post makes it abundantly clear that the ages of these things go:
mountains -> bones -> dinosaurs

The poster may either be a victim of Poe's Law, in which case their "joke" wasn't very funny, or they could be making the logical deduction as you describe but as a mistake. I thought it was the latter.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There's no mistake, he's just poking fun at the imprecise language used in the article. We all know what the author meant but only because English is more forgiving than math. I'm not saying I was rolling on the floor or anything, but it wasn't that bad of a joke imo