this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2023
110 points (91.7% liked)

Not The Onion

12196 readers
544 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Incredibly, they're still going to pick laundry workers based on race


Here in the United States, making hiring decisions based on race common but technically illegal under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. In the United Kingdom, they appear proud of the British Navy’s “century-old custom of having Chinese servants on warships,” and hate that it’s coming to an end.

You may expect this “custom” to be ending because the phrase “Chinese servants on warships” sounds like real old testament 19th-century racism, but that’s not the case. No, the Royal Navy is only ending the practice out of fears that laundry workers could hand military secrets to Beijing.

Those military secrets, according to the Telegraph, revolve around a collaborative effort between the U.S., UK, and Australian governments to produce more nuclear submarines to patrol the Pacific — an ocean famed for its proximity to the United Kingdom:

The move comes after Ken McCallum, the head of MI5 said China is trying to steal nuclear secrets from the UK and it was “high priority” for China to disrupt the UK, US and Australian partnership to build a new fleet of nuclear submarines.

...

However since the deal was announced, China’s spy agencies have tried to infiltrate the project and steal its secrets, Mr McCallum said.

Briefing journalists at a security summit in California last week, Mr McCallum said he could not disclose “specific” details of China’s attempts to hack into the project.

If you held some hope that the “security risk” thing was just a convenient way to end a blatantly racist practice, you’d be wrong. While the Royal Navy will stop employing — again, their wording — “Chinese servants,” the organization isn’t stopping race-based hiring altogether — it’s simply changing the race it hires for laundry. Now, those workers will come from Nepal.

This is one of those news stories that’s unfathomable in the year of our lord 2023, and yet here it is. Ending race-based hiring this late in the game would be absurd, but to simply swap out the race you’re hiring is mindboggling. Is the UK okay? What is happening over there?

link: https://jalopnik.com/british-navy-stops-using-chinese-servants-but-not-fo-1850959922

archive link: https://archive.ph/EuzeO

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Actually thats 100 % the reason I expected.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yup. This entire article sounds like sensasionalism. They mention the word 'race' several times. But Chinese is not a race, it is a nationality.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's both, actually. There's around 50M Chinese worldwide who aren't born in China and have no connection to the country.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Good point. But if I read the article correctly, the UK navy has no issue with these non Chinese nationals.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah just pointing out that the term can refer to the ethnicity as well, even if that's not the case here