146
submitted 11 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

Miracast is a standard not a implementation.

I am following NymphCast since the beginning and while it is still promising but beta software at best with limited functionality, by choosing the language 'AngleScript' theyhavee shot themself in the foot to.get new devs onboard.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago

Oh sure, I just didn't want to reference every miracast project, I suppose it is worth throwing a link for miraclecast out there though, since that seems like one of the most popular. I believe the GNOME desktop environment also had an effort to support miracast standard.

https://github.com/albfan/miraclecast

I just wanted to point out that fcast seems to have done their own thing when there were some efforts already in play, which is totally fine. I was just surprised I didn't see an entry in their FAQ like "How is fcast different from X?".

[-] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Oh yeah. Did not bother to look for OSS implementations. But seemingly there must be a problem with miracast. Otherwise i could not explain the bad adoption.

Only thing i can say that there is a need for a widly available/supported open 'cast' server and client software out there.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago

Sunshine / moonlight is the future. Soon it will shed the last remains of its historical Nvidia roots.

this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2023
146 points (98.7% liked)

Open Source

30324 readers
2356 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS