this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2023
1585 points (98.2% liked)
Funny
6879 readers
743 users here now
General rules:
- Be kind.
- All posts must make an attempt to be funny.
- Obey the general sh.itjust.works instance rules.
- No politics or political figures. There are plenty of other politics communities to choose from.
- Don't post anything grotesque or potentially illegal. Examples include pornography, gore, animal cruelty, inappropriate jokes involving kids, etc.
Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I mean, I get that that's something. But that only sounds very slightly better than overdraft fees in the first place.
"Pay us now, and when you go over it's fine unless it's more than you paid us"
But the thing is, overdrafting that small amount isn't even significant to a bank. They mostly use the ability to overdraft as an excuse to impose a fee. They can and do deny charges that they don't think they can impose a fee for.
So it kind of sounds like your bank just tricked you into paying ~3 of those fees up front with the promise that they won't charge you more unless they have to.
There are banks out there that don't charge overdraft fees at all. Capital one stopped recently. They just threaten to close your account when it sits negative for too long.
I should probably note that the $100 value was set by me. I could've bonded any amount as overdraft protection but $100 seemed like a safe amount. I don't disagree that overdraft fees are scams regardless, but it's definitely better than the alternative IMO