this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2023
50 points (98.1% liked)

Technology@stad

63 readers
4 users here now

Technology News and Opinion

founded 1 year ago
 

Because what could possibly go wrong.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Largely, I expect, because of the point you make. Needing an actual army of people to control them becomes a limiting factor. Add on to that that requiring remote control makes them vulnerable to jamming, and there's a strong incentive to start making them more and more autonomous both to enable fewer soldiers to control more bots, and to allow them to retain some function without it.

It just largely seems like it will be too significant a temptation.