this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2023
52 points (94.8% liked)

Linux

48190 readers
1313 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hi,

I saw there https://askubuntu.com/questions/9325/what-is-the-difference-between-man-and-info-documentation that info is "better" than man because is outdated. Still right in 2023 ?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

The "info" thing was a misguided attempt by a crazed bunch of emacs zealots to usurp the rightful position of "man". Probably GNU's worst idea. It persisted in having some popularity for a decade or more but is now mostly forgotten I think. Despite having used Debian for the past ten years straight I've only just now found out that info doesn't even get installed by default any more.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Eh, to be honest, manpages aren't particularly good as either documentation or quick references (hence the popularity of tldr), and info is intended primarily for the sort of long-form, comprehensive documentation that would be awkward to fit in a manpage. Also, texinfo documents can easily be exported to HTML, so one format can be used for both online and offline docs. It's an admirable effort, if nothing else.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'd have liked it a lot better if it had been intended and used as a place to put the more extensive documentation that isn't really appropriate for a man page, while leaving the man pages as they were. Instead, I learned about it back in the day by being frequently annoyed at missing man pages for basic tools, which had been replaced with suggestions to look at 'info' instead, which always seemed to be much less concise and have a worse UI.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

I wasn't a huge fan of manpages either until I got a kernel class at uni. The man pages for syscalls and library calls are super well made.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Actually sadly remember python-docs provided as info document.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

Can you provide any source that it was created or initiated by what you call 'a crazed bunch of emacs zealots', or that the goal was to 'unsurp the rightful position of "man"'. Quite bold statements that are unlikely to be true imho.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Emacs zealot here ... can confirm we're like this ;)

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just because it's theirs? I figured it would be because of an alleged gender issue, for the same reason some are trying to do away with whitelists/blacklists and the like.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

No, nothing to do with that sort of thing. The idea was that it'd be all hypertexty and therefore better.