this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2023
193 points (91.4% liked)

BrainWorms

1227 readers
8 users here now

Hey, welcome to BrainWorms.

This is a place where I post interesting things that I find and cant categorize into one of the main subs I follow. Enjoy a front seat as i descend into madness

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/3153498

The study is this one

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Please lecture me as to how the people who sell things for the people are responsible for the things people choose to buy.

You can start a movement to reduce your consumption but you would probably not convince anyone. Not even anti capitalists want to reduce their consumption. Its much easier to blame oil barrons and car manufacturers rather than you wanting to enable them. Im sure you are looking forward to buying your next car or your new house or go on that European adventure you were looking forward to or buy a new gym outfit or go to that new bar or buy that new game or.... thats just life right? Im sure you cant even imagine your life without those desires. And yet its their fault for providing that for you.

Im also sure you know nothing about supply chain. Nothing about regulation emissions. Nothing about reducing... but its so easy to say 'eat the rich' as if thats a catch all solution.

Do i say lead by example.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The car manufacturers wrote the zoning laws that turned America into a car-dependent hellscape. The oil barons lobby against every single initiative/bill that would reduce consumption of oil. In absence of government directives/incentives, people will simply do what is cheapest which, in a system designed by capitalists, is environmentally-unfriendly consumption. You seem to think that everyone who doesn't want average global temperatures to rise should simply stop consuming goods, but doing that on a scale that will actually change anything is stupidly unrealistic and possibly cataclysmic for our current economic system.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)