this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2023
319 points (81.3% liked)

Programmer Humor

32549 readers
488 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
319
Package managers be like (linux.community)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
159 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Sorry Python but it is what it is.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The issues I had:

  • packages installing but not working due to missing dependencies
  • packages installing but not working due to broken dependencies (wrong lib version installed)
  • packages not building and failing with obscure errors
  • one package was abandoned and using Python 2.7

If a 'pip install X' completes successfully but X doesn't work it's on pip. And when it fails it could tell you why. Cargo does.

[โ€“] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

packages installing but not working due to missing dependencies

This is the fault of the package author/maintainer

packages installing but not working due to broken dependencies

Sometimes the fault of the package author/maintainer. Sometimes this is the fault of a different package you're also trying to use in tandem. Ultimately this is a problem with the shared library approach python takes and it can be 'solved' by vendoring within your own package.

packages not building and failing with obscure errors

Assuming the package is good, this is a problem with your build system. It's like complaining a make file won't run because your system doesn't have gcc installed.

one package was abandoned and using Python 2.7

Unfortunately there's a ton of this kind of stuff. I suppose you can blame pypi for this, they should have some kind of warning for essentially abandoned projects.