this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2023
658 points (95.9% liked)

Science Memes

10970 readers
2392 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
658
How many? (lemmy.ca)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
54 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Dihydrogen Monoxide should be banned.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

And hydric acid too!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

It's too late. ALL world leaders are in BIG DHMO's pocket. They claim it is ESSENTIAL FOR LIFE and pay "scientists" to parrot this nonsense. WAKE UP PEOPLE. DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

!Hydro [email protected] is coming for you

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The funniest part is nobody officially recognizes this as a name.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Define nobody. I've heard this joke from at least high school and I'm over 40. My teacher pulled it on my class, and probably every class he had.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Go to any institution and scientific journal. You will never see this name. Nobody uses it aside from like you just said jokes and whatnot officially its never used. It's scientific name is water. Good luck finding this in anything published for peer review.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Ah, I didn't realize you meant it that way. I have no argument against that, nor do I desire to have one.