Wow, hope he understands the risks of being such a jackass.

So, I was in the military (American) and we literally had two ways to report sexual assault and rape. The first is a restricted report. It allows the victim to get medical attention and counseling, but prevents any kind of legal proceedings, investigation, and importantly doesn't inform the chain of command. A restricted report can be changed to an unrestricted report, however the second option cannot become restricted after it is unrestricted.

The second way is an unrestricted report and the main points are you get all the medical attention and counseling if you want it, but those who need to know in order to make decisions about where you'll be stationed, and how to punish the person responsible in the event that the investigation proves their guilt will ultimately know and this may lead to informal retribution which is obviously not ideal.

There are a lot of reasons a person might choose either report. To me it isn't about whether or not there was risk. That's just victim blaming plain and simple. It's about whether or not the person responsible should suffer the consequences of their actions and how the administration in charge handles that process.

That being said there have been many many problems with people coming forward about abuses like this and having their trauma and the events that lead to it brushed off or swept under the rug and quite frankly multiple people have died because of it.

Most victims don't go public. Especially not right away. This type of trauma takes time to process. And it comes with shame and a lot of other emotions that cause self blame. Asserting otherwise is just a fallacy.

I mean, the U.S. military explicitly has a clause in their contracts that tell you there is a risk of rape during your time in the military. They do the exact same thing, try to sweep this stuff under the rug.