this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2023
140 points (90.7% liked)

Green - An environmentalist community

5315 readers
26 users here now

This is the place to discuss environmentalism, preservation, direct action and anything related to it!


RULES:

1- Remember the human

2- Link posts should come from a reputable source

3- All opinions are allowed but discussion must be in good faith


Related communities:


Unofficial Chat rooms:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

As someone who has a large dog with cancer, I don't know how I could possibly manage her condition if I didn't have a personal vehicle without it being insanely burdensome. So many appointments and pharmacy visits.

You don't have to get rid of your car. You just have to not use it overly much. And no, this isn't an extremely niche case; tons of people have pets and they get sick. And of course humans get sick. I could be having the same problem with a child instead of a dog.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don't know your personal situation, but in my city there are lots of car share schemes that are cheap and easy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

My city has them, but they're not easy. The cars are never nearby.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

also, you don't have to take the sick pet to the grocery store, but you can take a bike, urban planning permitting

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sorry about your dog. But your example only highlights a tabu issue in these discussions, the negative impact that having a pet has. They consume meat, packaged food, are driven around, attack wild fauna (cats especially) etc. Pets is one of the items everyone should cut, but they're only becoming more common, like SUVs.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Dogs evolved alongside humans. You're never going to convince people to give them up.