this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2023
439 points (97.4% liked)

Political Memes

5412 readers
3361 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That was well explained and blows my mind a court is wasting any time on that.

Here we have the convention when drafting legislation that the conjunction 'and' at the end of a list it means all things in the list- so A, B, and C. Whereas if 'or' appears, it means a choice from the list.

I get that maybe once upon a time there needed to be clarification in the courts, but that cannot me the first time such a drafting approach has been taken in legislation in the USA and so an interpretation must have been established already?

I can see why contextually there could be room for either interpretation, but it's astonishing a consistent interpretation hasn't been established.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Like I said, it was likely made intentionally vague - either with malicious intent or to give wiggle room for this exact sort of legal debacle while still getting the legislation passed

Or, again, whoever wrote this is stupid

It’s really a coin toss for either option