this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2023
7 points (100.0% liked)
writing
271 readers
8 users here now
writing
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
FWIW, either approach sounds to me like it could work.. But I'm not a sensitivity reader. Ultimately, getting one to put eyes on your manuscript is probably a good idea.
Basically this.
Although, given new writers are sometimes kinda caught in that they don't have funds to pay one for their time, a work-around for me in the past was research by finding and following activists in the groups I'm trying to portray.
Usually they've spent years and years talking about the topic, so I figure if I find their stuff and I just read ALL of it and do as much research on it as I do for anything else (and by research, I really mean by spending months reading up on the topic from good sources), I'll be closer to being in the right ballpark even if I'm not in a spot to pay a sensitivity reader b/c I'm dead broke myself.
That sounds like a good strategy resulting in you really understanding the "source material".. more so than just farming the responsibility out to a sensitivity reader. However, for those who are lazy and broke, another option is to do a beta swap with someone who's in the group you want a sensitivity read from. Maybe you can't be too lazy for this option though, because trading manuscript critiques is a fair amount of work. But it's a different kind of work than doing a bunch of research, so it might appeal more to certain writers. Just thought I'd mention it.