this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2023
1823 points (89.9% liked)

Boost For Lemmy

7053 readers
2 users here now

Community of the Android app Boost for Lemmy Play Store Link

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
1823
This is not ok (lemmy.ml)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Saw this today and now I'm reconsidering if Boost is right for me. I'm really hoping this is shitty boiler plate that was accidentally copied and over looked because that is some bullshit to say "unless we decide we want to use your personal data for whatever we want".

I know "legitimate interest" is a phrase from the cookies law but there is no legitimate interest justification for this. My data is my data and I decide who has a legitimate interest in it so advertisers can fuck off, as can Boost if this the direction it's going.


Edit to say this blew up. I didn't realise I was kicking as big a hornet's nest and haven't read all the comments yet.

To be clear, what I don't like about this and other provisions in the terms is the language and implications around data use. I've no problem with ads being shown - I want developers to get paid for the work they do and that makes it possible for users to have "free" access to software if they can't afford to purchase.

I also want to add the response from Boost's dev below to make sure it's visible. You'll see that it is boilerplate but required by Google and was present in Boost for reddit. I just hadn't seen it because I purchased it immediately based on a recommendation. It doesn't make me happy about it but does remove some doubts I was having about the direction Boost is heading.

I will be purchasing the app to support the dev because I do like Boost but I understand not everyone can afford everything so you'll see some other suggestions in the comments below that don't have any ads if you're not happy with the free version and ads with their associated loss of data privacy.


Dev here.

The dialog and its content is not created by me, it is a standard solution from Google to comply with GDPR and other laws. More info here: https://support.google.com/admob/answer/10114014?hl=en

The consent dialog is also required by Google AdMob to show ads, and it is shown when the ad network is initialized.

When the app launches, first it checks for the remove ads purchase, and if it is not present, it will initialize the ads sdk. The ad network is not initialized if the remove ads purchase is detected.

Boost for Reddit was using the very same ad networks and consent dialog.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ok, that is informative. Without that specific context, that message is utterly empty and useless.

Of course, it still feels weird, that "legitimate interest" seems a subjective term and maybe they could have found some better phrasing to reflect this sentiment...

[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

From the dev has said, it sounds like it's Google's language, not his. So he probably doesn't have any control over the phrasing.

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Right, I was thinking not the developer, not the ad network, but all the way back to the wording of GDPR.

In fact, it feels like an ad network cannot have a "legitimate interest" in personal information of someone who opts out. If they count targeted advertising without consent as "legitimate interest", seems like GPDR is significantly less useful.