this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2023
490 points (91.4% liked)

Political Memes

5420 readers
3676 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are you busy trying to respond to every comment in a two month old post?

Libertarians are irrelevant, they are either rich entitled pricks or conservatives that like to do drugs.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are you busy trying to respond to every comment in a two month old post?

Pretty much.

Libertarians are irrelevant

I would argue that they are reaching a local maximum of societal relevance.

they are either rich entitled pricks or conservatives that like to do drugs.

That is a faulty generalization.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Their maximum relevance for society is getting 3% of the votes, and tell me why my generalization was faulty.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Their maximum relevance for society is getting 3% of the votes

By "local maximum of societal relevance" I wasn't talking in terms of absolute proportional vote, but instead of how germane the philosophy is to modern political discourse.

tell me why my generalization was faulty

You are making a hasty generalization. Based on how I interpret it, you are generalizing that a group of people calling themselves libertarians who satisfy your two examples -- namely "rich entitled pricks", and "conservatives that like to do drugs" -- are a satisfactory representation of the entirety of those who call themselves libertarians. If a single person makes a claim contrary to your statement, then it will immediately falsify it. You provide no evidence to refute the possibility those who fall into categories other than the examples that you gave who also self-label as libertarian.

As an aside, your statement "they are either rich entitled pricks or conservatives that like to do drugs" does nothing to support your claim of libertarians being irrelevant.