this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2023
105 points (92.7% liked)

Asklemmy

43893 readers
1123 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Suppose there are two employees: Alice and Bob, who do the same job at the same factory. Alice has a 10 minute (20RT) commute, Bob commutes 35 minutes(70RT).

If you're the owner of the factory, would you compensate them for their commutes? How would you do it?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 58 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Employees living far away is not something I would want to incentivize for so many reasons.

[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

But that's not what compensation for the commute would incentivize. I don't understand why people think getting paid to drive to work would mean employees would spend most of the week driving. It would mean employers would only hire employees who live upstairs.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

If someone enjoys driving more than their actual job, and they're getting paid to do it, it's arguably an incentive. At the very least, you're no longer decentivizing the commute by paying for it.

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Paying money for a behavior is an incentive for that behavior.

Does that mean every employee would choose to live far away to maximize their commuter mileage benefit? No.

Does that mean some barriers to living far away would be reduced, thus increasing odds that some employees would live further away, or that some prospective employees that live at distance would consider applying to this company over a company that doesn't offer a commuter mileage benefit? Yes.

Companies also aren't worried employees "would spend most of their weeks driving". Most companies don't include drive time as hours worked.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I would think free time is still more valuable in most cases.